Rockbox.org home
release
dev builds
extras
themes manual
wiki
device status forums
mailing lists
IRC bugs
patches
dev guide



Rockbox mail archive

Subject: RE: 2.1 Manual preliminary draft - comments please
From: Fred Maxwell (rockbox_at_anti-spam.org)
Date: 2003-11-29


Mark Bright wrote:

> May be better as :
> Most of the developing effort went into this tooling. So
> advanced users wishing to try this modification you don't
> need to worry, more casual users may feel uncomfortable using
> the first tool to reflash the firmware.
>
> To comfort you a bit again: The flash tools have been stable
> for quite a while. They have been used and abused during that
> time, with some users even reflashing with a track playing.
> Having said that, however, we don't generally recommend that. ;-)

Might I suggest another wording?

"Extensive development effort went into the development of the UART boot
mod. Mechanically adept users with good soldering skills can easily perform
these mods. Others may feel uncomfortable using the first tool
(firmware_flash.rock) for reflashing the firmware.

If you are starting with a known-good image, you are unlikely to experience
problems. The flash tools have been stable for quite a while. Several users
have used them extensively, even flashing while playing! Although it worked,
it's not the recommended method. ;-)"

> Should Read : In energy save mode the peak
> meter is updated just often enough to look fluent.

I believe the word you are looking for is "fluid".

Regards,
  Fred Maxwell



Page was last modified "Jan 10 2012" The Rockbox Crew
aaa