Rockbox.org home
release
dev builds
extras
themes manual
wiki
device status forums
mailing lists
IRC bugs
patches
dev guide



Rockbox mail archive

Subject: Re: a couple of questions about ver. 2.1
From: Mat Holton (mathew.holton_at_surface-inspection.com)
Date: 2003-12-02


I've allways been a firm believer in making everything configurable,
either through a text file or menu settings. Probably best for something like
this to be done thorugh a text file.

 

-----Original Message-----From: Linus Nielsen Feltzing <linus_at_haxx.se>To: rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se <rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se>Sent: 02/12/2003 10:35Subject: Re: a couple of questions about ver. 2.1Daniel Stenberg wrote:

> In my eyes we can either get people complaining by doing like we do now or we

> can revert the off functionality and go back to get the people complaining

> like they did before...

I have given this some thought, and I think the previous behaviour was

better. It responded to the OFF button, and the sleep timer could enter

the "charging" state (even though it didn't back then, but it could now).

I vote for reimplementing the OFF reboot code, with the exception that

we must handle it better for the flashed versions.

Linus

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Life's just a mood ring we're not allowed to see."

 They Might Be Giants.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Surface Inspection Ltd
www.surface-inspection.com



Page was last modified "Jan 10 2012" The Rockbox Crew
aaa