Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: Nathan Gray: "Re: FM Reflashing"
• Previous message: [IDC]Dragon: "RE: FM Reflashing was RE: all flashed recorders"
• In reply to: Linus Nielsen Feltzing: "Re: a couple of questions about ver. 2.1"
• Next in thread: Mat Holton: "Re: a couple of questions about ver. 2.1"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

" I vote for reimplementing the OFF reboot code, with the exception that

we must handle it better for the flashed versions."

Has an official decision been made on whether this change will be made
on the player?

-Dennis

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se [mailto:owner-rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se] On
Behalf Of Linus Nielsen Feltzing
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 2:36 AM
To: rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se
Subject: Re: a couple of questions about ver. 2.1

Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> In my eyes we can either get people complaining by doing like we do
now or we
> can revert the off functionality and go back to get the people
complaining
> like they did before...

I have given this some thought, and I think the previous behaviour was
better. It responded to the OFF button, and the sleep timer could enter
the "charging" state (even though it didn't back then, but it could
now).

I vote for reimplementing the OFF reboot code, with the exception that
we must handle it better for the flashed versions.

Linus

• Next message: Nathan Gray: "Re: FM Reflashing"
• Previous message: [IDC]Dragon: "RE: FM Reflashing was RE: all flashed recorders"
• In reply to: Linus Nielsen Feltzing: "Re: a couple of questions about ver. 2.1"
• Next in thread: Mat Holton: "Re: a couple of questions about ver. 2.1"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]