Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: Zakk Roberts: "Re: SERIOUS new logo attempt"
• Previous message: dennis barton: "Re: Rockbox 2.1 released"
• In reply to: Björn Stenberg: "Re: faq update"
• Next in thread: scott: "Re: faq update"
• Reply: scott: "Re: faq update"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Already beat him too it :)

If scott if you could go over the new faq id appreciate it as im sure i
missed things.

Rob

On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Björn Stenberg wrote:

scott wrote:
> upon further inspection, it seems quite a few of the questions are out of
> date, and some coupd probably be removed entirely now that 2.1 is out, such
> as 53 to 56.
>
> i'd be willing to make changes to it and send them back if there's any
> demand.

That sounds greate. Please do.

Edit the file http://rockbox.haxx.se/docs_/FAQ (or docs/FAQ in cvs) since that is the source for the html page.

-- 
Björn
+-- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --+
|  Robert E. Hak  < http://phobos.ramapo.edu/~rhak >  |
"If it's not on fire then it's a software problem."

• Next message: Zakk Roberts: "Re: SERIOUS new logo attempt"
• Previous message: dennis barton: "Re: Rockbox 2.1 released"
• In reply to: Björn Stenberg: "Re: faq update"
• Next in thread: scott: "Re: faq update"
• Reply: scott: "Re: faq update"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]