Rockbox.org home
release
dev builds
extras
themes manual
wiki
device status forums
mailing lists
IRC bugs
patches
dev guide



Rockbox mail archive

Subject: Re: FM Doom problems was Re: ANNOUNCE: Doom runs on AJB
From: BlueChip (cs_bluechip_at_webtribe.net)
Date: 2003-12-14


It is possible that you have not undertaken the full installation procedure.
You must NOT run the plugin!
You must just click on a file with .rvf on the end and a little icon in
front of it :)
If you cannot see the icon, you are not running the special firmware required.
You will also want to double check that video.rock is in the
/.rockbox/rocks directory.

:)

BC

>Jorg,
>Not sure what the problem is but after roloing to your Doom fm firmware
>and attempting to run the enclosed video plugin to check out the doom
>playing, I get the "plugin returned error" error again.
>Wheee.
>
>Just thought it should be known if not already, that it's broken for some
>people.
>Prior to the rolo I was running flashed cvs of 03-12-13
>
>-Nathan
>
>
>>From: "[IDC]Dragon" <idc-dragon_at_gmx.de>
>>Reply-To: rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se
>>To: rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se
>>Subject: Re: FM Reflashing
>>Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 19:45:37 +0100 (MET)
>>
>> > Jorg wrote:
>> > >This may be a case of my platform checks being too strict. It checks this
>> >
>> > >by
>> > >the version number. What does Debug->HW Info give you for the ROM
>> > version?
>> > >I
>> > >was prepared to see 1.23 there for FMs, maybe you have a different one?
>> >
>> > I see some interesting information in the Debug->HW Info screen.
>> > Here's a text snapshot for completeness: (note I have been flashing for
>> > awhile now)
>> >
>> > [Hardware Info]
>> > ROM: 2.00 <-- This is where 1.23 was expected, right?
>>
>>Correct. You have that 2.00 in there for an FM? I thought I've issued that
>>only for recorders.
>>
>>This is actually my fault. For the very first flash images I have given out,
>>I euphorically changed this number to 2.00, thinking this flashing stuff is
>>worth a new major version. Later I changed my mind and kept the original
>>version, who knows what it may be good for.
>>So I use it for a platform check now. I had to code the exception that I
>>accept 2.00 an a recorder now, because of above. But I didn't expect to find
>>that on FMs, so the check bails out.
>>
>>You can flash with "firmware_flash.rock" from a daily build before 11/30,
>>which didn't have the check. Then your 2.00 is gone and we're consistent
>>again.
>>
>>Jörg
>>
>>--
>>+++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++
>>Neu: Preissenkung für MMS und FreeMMS! http://www.gmx.net
>>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Take advantage of our best MSN Dial-up offer of the year — six months
>@$9.95/month. Sign up now! http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup



Page was last modified "Jan 10 2012" The Rockbox Crew
aaa