Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: Ingo Korb: "Re: Red Led Dead test II"
• Previous message: [IDC]Dragon: "Re: Problems"
• In reply to: Daniel Stenberg: "RE: BUGS - ARGH"
• Next in thread: Björn Stenberg: "Re: BUGS - ARGH"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

At 09:15 17/12/03, you wrote:
>On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Fred Maxwell wrote:
>
> > > If you can build it yourself, why use the 2.1 release code?
> >
> > The 2.1 code has been more thoroughly tested than the daily builds and the
> > documentation reflects version 2.1.
>
>We're drifting away from the topic, but I'll reply anyway. This thread
>concerns Rockbox development,

Go back and read the original email from me Stenberg.

Pay close attention, to the fact that I needed something that was
known-stable to test my dev-kit.

Read carefully the bit that says "BEFORE I report these as bugs, can I get
some confirmation please"

Ignore the bit that says "OI Stenberg, make up some facts and give me grief"

• Next message: Ingo Korb: "Re: Red Led Dead test II"
• Previous message: [IDC]Dragon: "Re: Problems"
• In reply to: Daniel Stenberg: "RE: BUGS - ARGH"
• Next in thread: Björn Stenberg: "Re: BUGS - ARGH"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]