Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: roland: "Re: (was Re: BUGS - ARGH)"
• Previous message: Fred Maxwell: "RE: (was Re: BUGS - ARGH)"
• In reply to: scott: "RE: Batteries?"
• Next in thread: scott: "RE: Batteries?"
• Reply: scott: "RE: Batteries?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Scott wrote:

> he said in his original post that it was OT.

So he doesn't have a right to criticize me for replying on the same topic.

> there was nothing inflammatory about his original post, and you weren't
> obligated to reply.

And there was nothing inflammatory in my reply to that post. It started out
with the sentence "Please encourage your friend to go back to NiMH batteries
for the sake of the environment." How is saying that or pointing out other
reasons to avoid the use of alkaline batteries inflammatory? Please, tell
me.

Regards,
  Fred Maxwell

• Next message: roland: "Re: (was Re: BUGS - ARGH)"
• Previous message: Fred Maxwell: "RE: (was Re: BUGS - ARGH)"
• In reply to: scott: "RE: Batteries?"
• Next in thread: scott: "RE: Batteries?"
• Reply: scott: "RE: Batteries?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]