|
|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: EAC/Lame THE ANSWER !!!From: Johan Vromans (jvromans_at_squirrel.nl) Date: 2003-12-20
You're such a nice guy to argue with ;-).
"Fred Maxwell" <rockbox_at_anti-spam.org> writes:
I've been polite so far. Don't spoil it.
> think that everyone has some great interest in the data on your hard
Get real. Many companies have great interest in my --and your-- data.
> He's developing a commercial SDK that he wants to sell.
That's okay. There are ways to organize that.
> Yes, I know the open source argument: "Anyone who wants to make
Your statement, not mine.
> Also, he may not want a bunch of hacks who know little about CD
That's okay. There are ways to organize that.
> You may like your work being stolen [...]
Your statement, not mine.
> > > It simply works better than anything else.
Yes, indeed, that's my choice. So EAC does not work for me. Now I'm
> So now you're implying that Andre Wiethoff might have violated the
I have no means to find out whether this is, or is not, the case. I
> You open source zealots have no shame. 'Anyone who won't give away
Your statement, not mine.
> I wouldn't be surprised to learn that you lure children into your
That's enough. I quit talking to you until you formally apologize.
-- Johan
Page was last modified "Jan 10 2012" The Rockbox Crew |