Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: Abdul-Khaliq Nathekar: "Recording into Directory"
• Previous message: Rocker: "Re: ext3 in archos?"
• In reply to: George Michaelson: "Re: ext3 in archos?"
• Next in thread: Joseph Jones: "Re: ext3 in archos?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, George Michaelson wrote:

> But I think a VFS abstraction cost would be small. Its almost innate in all
> unixes, including the various uCLinux/tinyBSD, which fit on SH3 class
> processors amongst others (eg Soekris) some of which have very constrained
> memory footprints. Yes, we're SH1. but its not like arguing for gcc on a
> pdp-8.

Sure, it could be done and if someone made a low-impact (for the standard
FAT-only case) and good-looking patch for this I bet we would apply it.

Talking about its virtues is one thing. Actually providing code that works is
a totally different beast.

-- 
 Daniel Stenberg -- http://rockbox.haxx.se/ -- http://daniel.haxx.se/

• Next message: Abdul-Khaliq Nathekar: "Recording into Directory"
• Previous message: Rocker: "Re: ext3 in archos?"
• In reply to: George Michaelson: "Re: ext3 in archos?"
• Next in thread: Joseph Jones: "Re: ext3 in archos?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]