Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: Mat Holton: "Re: Good news on 8M chip"
• Previous message: [IDC]Dragon: "Re: Various bug fixes and improvements - where to put?"
• In reply to: [IDC]Dragon: "Re: Various bug fixes and improvements - where to put?"
• Next in thread: Linus Nielsen Feltzing: "Re: Various bug fixes and improvements - where to put?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

[IDC]Dragon wrote:
> Oh, I overlooked that it is r0 only for byte/word store. This is great, so
> we can really get some more throughput into the ATA function.
> (Under the assuption that the disk corruption issue gets resolved, sniff!)

Yeah, I will try to hook up my box to a logic analyzer and trace the
WAIT signal to see if there's anything wrong. I'm also on the hunt for a
disk with a slow ATA interface, so I can see the problem with my own eyes.

> I vote for taking it out, leaving just the comment. It's a bit paranoid, at
> the wrong place.

It gets my vote too.

Linus

_______________________________________________
http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox

• Next message: Mat Holton: "Re: Good news on 8M chip"
• Previous message: [IDC]Dragon: "Re: Various bug fixes and improvements - where to put?"
• In reply to: [IDC]Dragon: "Re: Various bug fixes and improvements - where to put?"
• Next in thread: Linus Nielsen Feltzing: "Re: Various bug fixes and improvements - where to put?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]