Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: Linus Nielsen Feltzing: "Re: Sound quality test"
• Previous message: Gajdos_at_metatem.net: "Re: Sound quality test"
• In reply to: Linus Nielsen Feltzing: "Sound quality test"
• Next in thread: Linus Nielsen Feltzing: "Re: Sound quality test"
• Reply: Linus Nielsen Feltzing: "Re: Sound quality test"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi Linus,

> There is a discussion going on about the sound quality being worse with
> Rockbox than with the original firmware. Some people claim that the
> Rockbox stereo separation is "too wide, with too little punch".

whatever the result of this survey is, please make the defaults either
flat or Archos-like as a user selectable option. I highly prefer the flat
setting over the Archos-like defaults. Probably this depends on the
ear phones that I use. While I like the flat setting with my Porta Pro,
that already contains a lot of "punch", some other phones may require
a more "prepunched" signal.

What about presets that are implemented like WPS or saved configs just
for all sound options? The user can simply switch between settings for
his/her phones or amp used at home and for portable ear plugs.

Björn (Fischer)

-- 
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
GCS d--(+) s++: a- C+++(-) UB++++OSI++++$ P+++(-) L---(++) !E W- N+ o>+
K- !w !O !M !V  PS++  PE-  PGP++  t+++  !5 X++ tv- b+++ D++ G e+ h-- y+ 
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
_______________________________________________
http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox

• Next message: Linus Nielsen Feltzing: "Re: Sound quality test"
• Previous message: Gajdos_at_metatem.net: "Re: Sound quality test"
• In reply to: Linus Nielsen Feltzing: "Sound quality test"
• Next in thread: Linus Nielsen Feltzing: "Re: Sound quality test"
• Reply: Linus Nielsen Feltzing: "Re: Sound quality test"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]