Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: [ rockbox-Patches-920256 ] Traditional/Simplified Chinese patch
From: Björn Stenberg (bjorn_at_haxx.se)
Tat Tang wrote:
No, we simply want as much buffer as we can get since smaller buffer means shorter battery life.
> So, the proposed boot sequence is something like this:
Sounds good. Just note that we have no malloc, only buffer_alloc() which is for boot-time allocation of buffer space. Once allocated, it that cannot be returned.
> This seems clumsy, and it would be nicer if the user
I'd prefer to not change the font format. We could instead make font_load() look for a .charset file next to the .fnt file and load that if available.
-- Björn _______________________________________________ http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox
Page was last modified "Jan 10 2012" The Rockbox Crew