Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: George Styles: "Different way of doing talkbox?"
• Previous message: [IDC]Dragon: "need a function to delete an (empty) directory"
• In reply to: Aman Singer: "Fall back method for directories with no .dirname.mp3"
• Next in thread: Cristian: "Re: Fall back method for directories with no .dirname.mp3"
• Reply: Cristian: "Re: Fall back method for directories with no .dirname.mp3"
• Reply: Glenn Ervin at Home: "Re: Fall back method for directories with no .dirname.mp3"
• Reply: Aman Singer: "RE: Fall back method for directories with no .dirname.mp3"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> However, it would be even better if the directories
> that have no .dirname.mp3, instead of being spoken as numbers, were to be
> spelled.

Hmm, isn't that kindof annoying to "regular" talkbox users? I thought this
is too lenghy to be a reasonable fallback.
I'm not too fond of adding another option to specify the desired fallback
(silence, number, spell).
Maybe spell here only if the files have been set to spelling, too? But this
would also contribute to confusion. Hmm, any ideas?

Jörg

-- 
NEU : GMX Internet.FreeDSL
Ab sofort DSL-Tarif ohne Grundgebühr: http://www.gmx.net/info
_______________________________________________
http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox

• Next message: George Styles: "Different way of doing talkbox?"
• Previous message: [IDC]Dragon: "need a function to delete an (empty) directory"
• In reply to: Aman Singer: "Fall back method for directories with no .dirname.mp3"
• Next in thread: Cristian: "Re: Fall back method for directories with no .dirname.mp3"
• Reply: Cristian: "Re: Fall back method for directories with no .dirname.mp3"
• Reply: Glenn Ervin at Home: "Re: Fall back method for directories with no .dirname.mp3"
• Reply: Aman Singer: "RE: Fall back method for directories with no .dirname.mp3"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]