Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: Mat Holton: "Re: from dirname.tbx to .talk"
• Previous message: George Styles: "Re: from dirname.tbx to .talk"
• In reply to: George Styles: "Re: from dirname.tbx to .talk"
• Next in thread: Luca: "Re: from dirname.tbx to .talk"
• Reply: Luca: "Re: from dirname.tbx to .talk"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Well, if there's a vote going on - I'm all for short names, so

[X] *.tbx

>.talk is good (in fact anything except .mp3 will suit me :)
>
>g
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Björn Stenberg" <bjorn_at_haxx.se>
>To: "Rockbox development" <rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se>
>Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 11:59 AM
>Subject: Re: from dirname.tbx to .talk
>
>
> > Mat Holton wrote:
> > > It doesn't seem like much .tbx to .talk, but it is more meaningfull. But
>why
> > > stop at talk? why not .talkbox?
> >
> > Because 'box' doesn't actually add any information for those who haven't
>been following this mailing list and the history of Rockbox speech patches.
> >
> > --
> > Björn
> > _______________________________________________
> > http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox
>
>_______________________________________________
>http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox

_______________________________________________
http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox

• Next message: Mat Holton: "Re: from dirname.tbx to .talk"
• Previous message: George Styles: "Re: from dirname.tbx to .talk"
• In reply to: George Styles: "Re: from dirname.tbx to .talk"
• Next in thread: Luca: "Re: from dirname.tbx to .talk"
• Reply: Luca: "Re: from dirname.tbx to .talk"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]