Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: scott: "FAQ #68"
• Previous message: Glenn Ervin at Home: "Re: new recorder 20, bad sectors"
• In reply to: Jack: "Re: talkBox filenames"
• Next in thread: Christopher Moore: "Re: talkBox filenames"
• Reply: Christopher Moore: "Re: talkBox filenames"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I don't care if it is at the top or bottom, as long as I can change the name
in windows.
Glenn

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jack" <jack_at_sylviawebster.f2s.com>
To: <Gajdos_at_metatem.net>; <rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se>
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 12:42 PM
Subject: Re: talkBox filenames

Yes... but no. Someone today suggested we should use ~ as a prefix, to send
it to the bottom of the list. Does anyone have any insightful comments about
that?

Otherwise, Underscore seems fine.

I think we're all sure we want .talk , however.

=======================================

On 19.04.2004 at 07:12 PM Gajdos_at_metatem.net wrote:

>On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 at 14:15, Björn Stenberg wrote:
>
>> [IDC]Dragon wrote:
>> > Has the dust settled meanwhile? Do we want it "_dirname.talk"?
>
>Yes.
>/JG
>_______________________________________________
>http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox

Jack (My Website)

_______________________________________________
http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox

_______________________________________________
http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox

• Next message: scott: "FAQ #68"
• Previous message: Glenn Ervin at Home: "Re: new recorder 20, bad sectors"
• In reply to: Jack: "Re: talkBox filenames"
• Next in thread: Christopher Moore: "Re: talkBox filenames"
• Reply: Christopher Moore: "Re: talkBox filenames"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]