Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: Matthias.Klumpp_at_gmx.de: "Re: Suggestion: Talking dirs w/o .dirname possible ?"
• Previous message: harris zatuchney: "Re: Rocckbox Install"
• In reply to: Matthias.Klumpp_at_gmx.de: "Re: power on mod and access to the SC1 pin"
• Next in thread: Matthias.Klumpp_at_gmx.de: "Re: power on mod and access to the SC1 pin"
• Reply: Matthias.Klumpp_at_gmx.de: "Re: power on mod and access to the SC1 pin"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> As I remember, the contact of the buttons is done with some rubber
> contacts,
> equal to those in TV remotes.

No, it has "real" pushbuttons, similar to what's inside a mouse. Otherwise
you wouldn't get a tactile click.

> I could imagine it should not be as difficult to solder a thin (maybe very
> thin) wire on the other side of the board (not the contact side).

Should be possible, the contact side it probably even easier.

> > no need for a transistor, just use the tristate function of the io pin
> > to do open collector.
>
> So using the JB's uC, or your one in your HW ?
> Unfortunately Atmel uC's don't have tristate outs....

They sure do, I've used them this way myself. You have to reprogram a pin as
an input, then it becomes high impedance.

Jörg

-- 
"Sie haben neue Mails!" - Die GMX Toolbar informiert Sie beim Surfen!
Jetzt aktivieren unter http://www.gmx.net/info
_______________________________________________
http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox

• Next message: Matthias.Klumpp_at_gmx.de: "Re: Suggestion: Talking dirs w/o .dirname possible ?"
• Previous message: harris zatuchney: "Re: Rocckbox Install"
• In reply to: Matthias.Klumpp_at_gmx.de: "Re: power on mod and access to the SC1 pin"
• Next in thread: Matthias.Klumpp_at_gmx.de: "Re: power on mod and access to the SC1 pin"
• Reply: Matthias.Klumpp_at_gmx.de: "Re: power on mod and access to the SC1 pin"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]