|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Naming convention for .RocksRe: Naming convention for .Rocks
From: Linus Nielsen Feltzing <linus_at_haxx.se>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 07:15:57 +0200 Brent Geery wrote: > Am I the only one, or are rocks starting to get a little confusing? > Some rocks can be directly, run, while others only run properly when > you "run" an associated file type. This gets confusing when browsing > all the Rocks. > > Maybe Rocks that are not supposed to be directly run should be add "." > to the beginning of the filename (like the rockbox directory) to make > them "hidden" when browsing ect. > We are looking into this patch: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&atid=439120&group_id=44306&aid=879411 which will solve this problem. Linus _______________________________________________ http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox Received on 2004-05-13 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |