Rockbox mail archive
Subject: Re: Naming convention for .Rocks
From: Linus Nielsen Feltzing (linus_at_haxx.se)
Brent Geery wrote:
> Am I the only one, or are rocks starting to get a little confusing?
> Some rocks can be directly, run, while others only run properly when
> you "run" an associated file type. This gets confusing when browsing
> all the Rocks.
> Maybe Rocks that are not supposed to be directly run should be add "."
> to the beginning of the filename (like the rockbox directory) to make
> them "hidden" when browsing ect.
We are looking into this patch:
which will solve this problem.
Page was last modified "Jan 10 2012" The Rockbox Crew