Rockbox.org home
release
dev builds
extras
themes manual
wiki
device status forums
mailing lists
IRC bugs
patches
dev guide



Rockbox mail archive

Subject: Re: Naming convention for .Rocks
From: Linus Nielsen Feltzing (linus_at_haxx.se)
Date: 2004-05-13


Brent Geery wrote:

> Am I the only one, or are rocks starting to get a little confusing?
> Some rocks can be directly, run, while others only run properly when
> you "run" an associated file type. This gets confusing when browsing
> all the Rocks.
>
> Maybe Rocks that are not supposed to be directly run should be add "."
> to the beginning of the filename (like the rockbox directory) to make
> them "hidden" when browsing ect.
>

We are looking into this patch:

http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&atid=439120&group_id=44306&aid=879411

which will solve this problem.

Linus

_______________________________________________
http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox



Page was last modified "Jan 10 2012" The Rockbox Crew
aaa