Rockbox mail archive
Subject: Re: Naming convention for .Rocks
From: Brent Geery (fasttimes_at_fasttimesatridgemonthigh.org)
Date: 2004-05-13
On Thu, 13 May 2004 07:15:57 +0200, Linus Nielsen Feltzing
<linus_at_haxx.se> wrote:
> Brent Geery wrote:
>
> > Am I the only one, or are rocks starting to get a little confusing?
> > Some rocks can be directly, run, while others only run properly when
> > you "run" an associated file type. This gets confusing when browsing
> > all the Rocks.
> >
> > Maybe Rocks that are not supposed to be directly run should be add "."
> > to the beginning of the filename (like the rockbox directory) to make
> > them "hidden" when browsing ect.
>
> We are looking into this patch:
>
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&atid=439120&group_id=44306&aid=879411
>
> which will solve this problem.
Works for me! :)
--
BRENT - The Usenet typo king. :)
Fast Times At Ridgemont High Info http://www.FastTimesAtRidgemontHigh.org
Voted #87 - American Film Institute's Top 100 Funniest American Films
_______________________________________________
http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox
Page was last modified "Jan 10 2012" The Rockbox Crew
|