Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: sophana: "Re: found a bug in power_off()"
• Previous message: Michael T. Kupietz, wearing a pointy hat: "Re: feature ideas... plausible? desired?"
• In reply to: sophana: "found a bug in power_off()"
• Next in thread: sophana: "Re: found a bug in power_off()"
• Reply: sophana: "Re: found a bug in power_off()"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

sophana wrote:
> I found out that when I remove the while(1); at the end of the
> routine, it works... :-)

I had the same experience once, but as soon as I started debugging it,
the problem disappeared. And now I see it again. Let's hope that I find
it this time...

> This must be caused by the optimizer optmizing too much, even if the
> and_b and or_b routine are in assembly inline. (the optimizer is
> generally working at the assembler level I think)

What makes you think that? Did you disassemble it? I just did, and I
can't see anything wrong with it.

Linus
_______________________________________________
http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox

• Next message: sophana: "Re: found a bug in power_off()"
• Previous message: Michael T. Kupietz, wearing a pointy hat: "Re: feature ideas... plausible? desired?"
• In reply to: sophana: "found a bug in power_off()"
• Next in thread: sophana: "Re: found a bug in power_off()"
• Reply: sophana: "Re: found a bug in power_off()"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]