Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: Daniel Stenberg: "Re: Bluechip forking"
• Previous message: sophana: "Re: Bluechip forking"
• In reply to: sophana: "Re: Bluechip forking"
• Next in thread: sophana: "Re: Bluechip forking"
• Reply: sophana: "Re: Bluechip forking"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

sophana wrote:
> the linux kernel has TONs of options (with xconfig...)
> rockbox has a (very small) configure script. It should exploited better,
> don't you think?

More options means more builds, and more combinations in which to hunt bugs.

And the fact is that most people (I'd guess >95%) don't know how to compile their own build, and so for the vast majority this work would be wasted.

> The number of waiting patches is clearly high...

Yes, but that is not helped much by making branches in the version control system. A branch is no different than a patch.

-- 
Björn
_______________________________________________
http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox

• Next message: Daniel Stenberg: "Re: Bluechip forking"
• Previous message: sophana: "Re: Bluechip forking"
• In reply to: sophana: "Re: Bluechip forking"
• Next in thread: sophana: "Re: Bluechip forking"
• Reply: sophana: "Re: Bluechip forking"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]