Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Bluechip forking
From: Daniel Stenberg (daniel_at_haxx.se)
On Tue, 8 Jun 2004, sophana wrote:
> I know that maintaining a lot of build option in the same cvs branch is hard
I disagree. I'm involved in many projects where we keep track of lots of
> But I think there is definitly something to do to implement lots of things
I think we should implement everything sensible in Rockbox, and allow basicly
> A tool like subversion instead of cvs does help a LOT in managing branches.
I don't think we have a problem with the versioning tool at this point. I
We are determined to switch to Subversion one day.
> the linux kernel has TONs of options (with xconfig...) rockbox has a (very
Possibly. Any particular specific suggestions?
> I know that the most configurable, and the most complex it will be. maybe
I don't think it is that simple. Code changes in one end affects things in the
> The number of waiting patches is clearly high...
Yes, but there are many reasons for that. The most common one is that the code
We invite all users to test all patches and comment them/update them/improve
-- Daniel Stenberg -- http://rockbox.haxx.se/ -- http://daniel.haxx.se/ _______________________________________________ http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox
Page was last modified "Jan 10 2012" The Rockbox Crew