|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: RE: A thought on the voice UIRE: A thought on the voice UI
From: BlueChip <cs_bluechip_at_webtribe.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 02:43:50 +0100 I have pondered the same myself, but as each file will be very tiny it MUST take up 4K of disk space due to sector allocation size. That's a LOT of hdd space. One big file with the lot in is a better idea - but then loading and playing the right chunk could be quite battery hungry and slow with lots of hdd access. hmmmmm BC >Hi. > >I don't know if it is possible or not, but for what it's worth, I think it's >an awesome idea. > >Actually, I whish there was a way to generate file names with a script like >we currently use to generate folder names, although hd space I guess might >become a factor since we could be talking about hundreds of file names. > >Best regards, > >Rick Alfaro >ralfaro_at_bellsouth.net > > >-----Original Message----- >From: rockbox-bounces_at_cool.haxx.se [mailto:rockbox-bounces_at_cool.haxx.se] On >Behalf Of Christi Alice Scarborough >Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 4:30 PM >To: Rockbox development >Subject: A thought on the voice UI > > >Would it be possible / sensible to have the voice UI fall back to >spelling rather than directory numbering when it can't find a >"_dirname.talk" file? Possibly it could be implemented so that it falls >back to the method specified in "voice filenames", which would yield >consistency throughout the interface. > >Thanks, > >Christi >_______________________________________________ >http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox > >_______________________________________________ >http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox _______________________________________________ http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox Received on 2004-06-11 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |