Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: Glenn Ervin at Home: "Re: Problem with buttons"
• Previous message: Salokyn: "Re: implementing sort by date / what do you think?"
• In reply to: Henrik Backe: "Re: implementing sort by date / what do you think?"
• Next in thread: Glenn Ervin at Home: "Re: implementing sort by date / what do you think?"
• Reply: Glenn Ervin at Home: "Re: implementing sort by date / what do you think?"
• Reply: Rocker: "Re: implementing sort by date / what do you think?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

>From the feedback received, I now would suggest the following:

Sort options for directories and files are independent. Directories are
always first sorted first, before the files.

Directory options are:
- alphabetical (defalt)
- by date
- reverse by date

File options are:
- alphabetical (default)
- by type (identical types sorted alphabetically)
- by date
- reverse by date

The sorting by type can be done easily (I think) by using the internal
attribute value. I would shuffle the values a bit to have playlists, first,
then mp3, then other the other known types. Unknown ones would go last.

How's that?
Jörg

-- 
"Sie haben neue Mails!" - Die GMX Toolbar informiert Sie beim Surfen!
Jetzt aktivieren unter http://www.gmx.net/info
_______________________________________________
http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox

• Next message: Glenn Ervin at Home: "Re: Problem with buttons"
• Previous message: Salokyn: "Re: implementing sort by date / what do you think?"
• In reply to: Henrik Backe: "Re: implementing sort by date / what do you think?"
• Next in thread: Glenn Ervin at Home: "Re: implementing sort by date / what do you think?"
• Reply: Glenn Ervin at Home: "Re: implementing sort by date / what do you think?"
• Reply: Rocker: "Re: implementing sort by date / what do you think?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]