Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: Chuck Urwiler: "recording bug?"
• Previous message: Jocelyn Delalande: "Re: some jukebox newbie questions"
• In reply to: Fred Maxwell: "Re: Rockbox FAQ for the blind"
• Next in thread: BlueChip: "Re: Rockbox FAQ for the blind"
• Reply: BlueChip: "Re: Rockbox FAQ for the blind"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Fred Maxwell wrote:
> BlueChip wrote:
>
>> I never realised Franklin was illiterate.
>
>
> Franklin, Webster, and others who attempted to reform English spelling
> were not "illiterate." Many of them recognized that it was absurd to
> spell a work "checque" when it was not pronounced CHEK-cue. They knew
> that it made no sense to add a silent letter "u" to words like color,
> and honor.
>
> You act as if any change to the language is horrific, yet your use of
> English bears little resemblence to the English written by William
> Shakespeare.

Shall I compare rockbox to an Archos firmware?
Rockbox art more lovely and more temperate.

> If you want to speak a language which never evolves, might I suggest Latin?

I thought you were going to say FORTRAN for a minute there...

_______________________________________________
http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox

• Next message: Chuck Urwiler: "recording bug?"
• Previous message: Jocelyn Delalande: "Re: some jukebox newbie questions"
• In reply to: Fred Maxwell: "Re: Rockbox FAQ for the blind"
• Next in thread: BlueChip: "Re: Rockbox FAQ for the blind"
• Reply: BlueChip: "Re: Rockbox FAQ for the blind"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]