Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: Mat Holton: "Re: AW: Porting Rockbox to XCleff 800 / i.Beat 500"
• Previous message: Gajdos_at_metatem.net: "WPS: pitch and F3 bugfix"
• In reply to: VooDoo: "AW: Porting Rockbox to XCleff 800 / i.Beat 500"
• Next in thread: VooDoo: "AW: AW: Porting Rockbox to XCleff 800 / i.Beat 500"
• Reply: VooDoo: "AW: AW: Porting Rockbox to XCleff 800 / i.Beat 500"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

VooDoo wrote:

> Is there anyone else with this player?

Not that I know of, and that's probably one of the major issues that
makes us reluctant to work on the xclef. It isn't very common.

Other than that, it's a really nice platform. The CPU is common and well
documented, and the encoding/decoding is in software.

Linus

_______________________________________________
http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox

• Next message: Mat Holton: "Re: AW: Porting Rockbox to XCleff 800 / i.Beat 500"
• Previous message: Gajdos_at_metatem.net: "WPS: pitch and F3 bugfix"
• In reply to: VooDoo: "AW: Porting Rockbox to XCleff 800 / i.Beat 500"
• Next in thread: VooDoo: "AW: AW: Porting Rockbox to XCleff 800 / i.Beat 500"
• Reply: VooDoo: "AW: AW: Porting Rockbox to XCleff 800 / i.Beat 500"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]