Rockbox mail archive

• Next message: Linus Nielsen Feltzing: "Re: AW: News about charging problem ???"
• Previous message: Matthias Klumpp: "AW: News about charging problem ???"
• In reply to: Björn Stenberg: "Re: MDB backwards compatible?"
• Next in thread: Linus Nielsen Feltzing: "Re: MDB backwards compatible?"
• Reply: Linus Nielsen Feltzing: "Re: MDB backwards compatible?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

By now I'm confused.

If I have, for example, a cfg that says bass 5, loudness 3, bass boost 20%,
and I load that cfg in a 2.2 recorder 20, does 2.2 recognize any of these
bass, loudness and bass boost settings?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Björn Stenberg" <bjorn_at_haxx.se>
To: "Rockbox development" <rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se>
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 1:40 AM
Subject: Re: MDB backwards compatible?

> Mat Holton wrote:
> > you could use a file that contains tags for each piece of data.
> > then if the tag isn't used, it's ignored.
>
> That is how it works already. I seem to have misread the question.
>
> .cfg files with new parameters will work with old firmware. The old
firmware will simply ignore the parameters it doesn't understand.
>
> --
> Björn
> _______________________________________________
> http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox
>

_______________________________________________
http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox

• Next message: Linus Nielsen Feltzing: "Re: AW: News about charging problem ???"
• Previous message: Matthias Klumpp: "AW: News about charging problem ???"
• In reply to: Björn Stenberg: "Re: MDB backwards compatible?"
• Next in thread: Linus Nielsen Feltzing: "Re: MDB backwards compatible?"
• Reply: Linus Nielsen Feltzing: "Re: MDB backwards compatible?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]