|
|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Writing plug-insRe: Writing plug-ins
From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_rockbox.org>
Date: 2005-01-10
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, BlueChip wrote:
(I'll only response once on this subject to reduce the FUD BC spreads about
> Rockbox threatened me with legal action and demanded that I use "GPL" (??"or
For the record, we (at least I) objected to you not releasing the source code
> BSD may be "compatable", and "compatable" may go unchallenged, I don't know.
The Modified BSD license is compatible, yes. The Original BSD is not.
See http://www.fsf.org/licenses/license-list.html#GPLCompatibleLicenses and
> I have a number of (some nasty) emails from Rockbox (leaders) that I have
Plugins are not statically linked, they're dynamically linked. And we did
> A mate of mine who (now) used to be (LOL) an advocate of GPL, told me of a
Sorry, but that would be a license violation. Ask your friend to read the
> and releasing the compiled binaries on anonymous sites as "unofficial
Releasing anonymous binaries of GPL software is not to find loop-holes in the
> Also, apparently because I do not include a "paper mail" contact address, my
That's not a problem related to GPL. That's a problem between the Rockbox
-- Daniel Stenberg -- http://www.rockbox.org/ -- http://daniel.haxx.se/ _______________________________________________ http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockboxReceived on Mon Jan 10 19:37:31 2005 Page was last modified "Jan 10 2012" The Rockbox Crew |