> ****
> If you think about it, for people who often skip tracks before they are
> finished, the scheme would be buffering more of what they actually hear, as
> opposed to what they miss because of changing to another track.

I would be in favour of such a feature. (As I am a track-skipper myself ;)

Also, the objection that it would work only for one next track does
not really hold since what takes time is the disk wake-up.

It's rather difficult to implement though.

Cheers,
jyp.
_______________________________________________
http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox
Received on Wed Feb 16 22:31:22 2005