Rockbox mail archive
Subject: Re: raising the bar in language support
Re: raising the bar in language support
Joel Wiramu Pauling wrote:
> I can see where having an xml parser might be usefull. But I don't think
> we need to code one:
>
> have a look at :http://www.grinninglizard.com/tinyxmldocs/files.html
I'm not so sure using a parser such as this is a great idea. I may be
the only one who cares, but it's written in C++ so not only would we be
adding someone else's C++ code into Rockbox we'd have to write C++
wrapper functions so our existing C code could make use of it. More C++
code. I, for one, like the fact that Rockbox is entirely written in C
(well, minus the assembly).
Dave
_______________________________________________
http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox
Received on Mon Jul 11 17:02:12 2005
Page was last modified "Jan 10 2012" The Rockbox Crew
|