Rockbox mail archive
Subject: RE: New DevKit v3.11 Available
RE: New DevKit v3.11 Available
The subject header was only intended to be highlighted for the intial
announcement, my bad, sorry, now changed to be the same, just less intrusive.
I just went to try this, and had CVS troubles ...then tried to get to
www.rockbox.org and it not there! I will try again when the server trouble
>OK, 3.11 downloaded and installed,
>First attempt - H120/140 Win32 Sim Build...
>* You have a broken sed version. You must upgrade
>* to be able to generate a fine Makefile .
>* See details at:
>Sed --version shows 4.0.9, BrokenSed page recommends 4.1.2 or later
>Next Attempt - H120/140 Firmware (English)
>- After running Make in the tools dir -
>All seems to make with no errors, not actually got around to testing if it
>works on the actual hardware yet tho'...
>|[mailto:email@example.com] On Behalf Of BlueChip
>|Sent: 19 July 2005 16:52
>|To: firstname.lastname@example.org; Rockbox development
>|Subject: Re: == NEW DEVKIT v3.11 AVAILABLE ==
>|> >>The devkit failed to make a normal english h120 build for
>|me. Got to:
>|> >>make:/home/guest/tarball/tools/convbdf: Command not found
>|> >>make: ***
>|> >>make: *** [all] Error 2
>|> > Run 'make' in tools.
>|>Maybe this step ought to be automatic when you run `make' to build
>|>rockbox? This seems to be, by far, the most frequent "it
>|>for me, what's wrong?" I mean, if all the depends are set
>|right it will
>|>either do the build or skip them all.
>|>Just a thought.
>|Before I document a work-around to this problem ...Would any
>|of the core guys care to comment on any reasons why this
>|cannot be included as a part of the build process?
>|Something which equate to this would be sufficient:
>|if exist ../tools/convbdf.exe goto ok
Received on Wed Jul 20 17:49:39 2005
Page was last modified "Jan 10 2012" The Rockbox Crew