Yes, this is another good and simple solution to the problem.

As the core devs have been unable to fix this, perhaps someone more
experienced in such matters could submit a patch for this?

BC

>Would it make sense to run 'tools make' from the configure script?
>
>~ray
>
>Andrew 'ashridah' Pilley wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 22:49 +0200, Linus Nielsen Feltzing wrote:
> >> BlueChip wrote:
> >> > Before I document a work-around to this problem ...Would any of the
> >> core
> >> > guys care to comment on any reasons why this cannot be included as a
>part of the build process?
> >>
> >> The makefils actually did this not long ago, but we removed it. The
>reason is that make wasn't very good at handling cross compilation and
>native compilation in the same build, resulting in weird errors on some
>operating systems.
> >
> > Uh, isn't that the idea behind using $HOSTCC and $CC?
> > ie, CC for the target, HOSTCC for things that need to be compiled for
>the host?
> >
> > For the simulator, CC would be equal to HOSTCC, but for the iriver and
>archos builds, you'd set CC to m68k-elf-gcc/sh-elf-gcc and leave HOSTCC
>as just gcc...
> >
> > It's the convention I've run into in the past, at least.
> >
> > Andrew
>
>
>
>
>--
>Politicians and diapers have one thing in common. They should both be
>changed regularly, and for the same reason.
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox

_______________________________________________
http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox
Received on Thu Jul 21 15:42:32 2005