Pedro Vasconcelos wrote:

>>You can also note that the pcm buffer is much smaller (especially with
>>no crossfade), and the so called watermark limit has not been reduced
>
>
> Ah, I hadn't noticed that. Any clue as to why was the buffer made smaller?

To leave more room for the file buffering mainly. But the purpose of
that was to increase battery time, not reduce it...

   Magnus
_______________________________________________
http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox
Received on Fri Jul 29 18:10:32 2005