On Sun, 7 Aug 2005, Mats Lidell wrote:

> OOPS! (As you might understand!?) I by mistake read it "replay again"
> which I though was a strange feature but not strange enough to
> recognize my mistake. Thanks for the feedback.

I suspected something like that, yes...

> I have this idea to try hard to find a Swedish translation, even if
> they are bad. At the same time I also try to do it fast just by
> examining the lang file. This means that I often haven't got a clue
> what I'm translating. I use this method assuming it is better to have
> a bad translation than none and at the same time to provoke some
> feedback. Comments!?

Well, assuming you get feedback, that might work. :)

For me, concistency is important (i.e., the same word or phrase is always
translated in the same way), and also that the translation works well in
the context where it appears, and this method doesn't seem to promote
that...

Perhaps I should send you my svenska.lang? It's still a work in progress
though (there are some things I'm not entirely happy with).

--
Magnus Holmgren
_______________________________________________
http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox