I'm sure no-one would mind an extension of a week or so, if it helped iron
out all the bugs. :)

Development can wait.

On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 08:09:36 +0100, Daniel Stenberg <daniel@rockbox.org>
wrote:

> On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, [IDC]Dragon wrote:
>
>> @ other devs: are we on schedule for v2.5?
>
> We still have about 12 more or less serious bugs listed for fixing on
>
> http://www.rockbox.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/ReleaseTodo
>
> I think we will need to wait and see what we are capable for fixing and
> when Monday comes closer we should/could downgrade some or all of the
> remaining bugs to be "fix post 2.5".
>
> If not, (and this is only what I suggest in case we don't get a 2.5 out
> the door in time) I can see how our freeze will hamper new development
> and if we are to wait further we should make a branch for these
> remaining bug fixes only. But doing so, we'd let the development going
> again on the HEAD branch and we'd lose the "momentum" of bug fixing that
> we have right now.
>
> IMHO
>

-- 
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
_______________________________________________
http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox