> Can you please explain why 0 is a better "faked" CRC than 1? Both can be a
> valid CRC so setting 0 is not a good way to detect it as disabled, right?

I have no idea what detail you're talking about, but I recall that a CRC
cannot become zero. (If this is a real CRC, not a checksum)

Jörg

-- 
5 GB Mailbox, 50 FreeSMS http://www.gmx.net/de/go/promail
+++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++
_______________________________________________
http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/rockbox