This is far off topic for this list and I apologize to
The members, but I have to point this out.
There were six major and six minor inaccuracies in Mr. Leventhal's
article. He obviously did not use VO at all and, unfortunately, poorly
researched his topic. If anyone is interested, please contact me off list
and I will be happy to provide a rebuttal article written by an experienced
VoiceOver user AFB has, so far, refused to publish.
John D. Panarese
Technologies for the Visually Impaired, Inc.
9 Nolan Court
Hauppauge, NY 11788
Tel/Fax, (631) 724-4479
AUTHORIZED DISTRIBUTORS FOR PORTSET SYSTEMS LTD, COMPSOLUTIONS VA, PREMIER
ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INDEX, PAPENMEIER, REPRO-TRONICS, PULSEDATA,
DUXBURY, DANCING DOTS, ROBOTRON, AND OTHER PRODUCTS FOR THE BLIND AND
From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On
Behalf Of Sarai
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 3:43 PM
Subject: RE: Why not iPod?
Well that depends on who you talk to. I think the alternative program is
anapod? I know that AFB didn't find it accessible.
From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
On Behalf Of brian hartgen
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 2:28 PM
Subject: Re: Why not iPod?
iTunes is accessible with jaws for windows right now.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sarai" <email@example.com>
To: "'Rockbox'" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 7:31 PM
Subject: RE: Why not iPod?
> If you guys make it accessible i.e. it will speak, a lot of blind
> people will be happy, but you also have to make Itunes accessible as
> well, even though there is an alternative program out there to replace
> Itunes, its not that great. If you guys can make it work, I know a lot
> of blind people who will jump up and down. I just hope you do a better
> job than the programmers who made Tiger, the voice application for
> Apple. Its bad to say the least!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: email@example.com
> On Behalf Of Neon John
> Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 1:23 PM
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: Why not iPod?
> OK, right off the bat, let me say that I despise Apple, Steve Jobs and
> most of what they stand for. Ahem.
> That said, is there any reason why the iPod isn't considered for a
> RockBox port? It would seem that with a port of Linux running on the
> thing, there should be enough info out there for a port.
> As I scan the racks of even Walmart and see all the nifty accessories
> that work only with an iPod, I have to admit that it would be a nice
> host for RockBox. I'd LOVE to have a set of amplified speakers into
> which my jukebox would simply snap, like those offered by several
> different companies for the iPod.
> I don't want to even appear to become an AppleDroid but OTOH, the
> hardware is nice...
> John De Armond
> See my website for my current email address http://www.johngsbbq.com
> Cleveland, Occupied TN
Received on Fri Sep 23 21:59:46 2005