Rockbox mail archive
Subject: O/T Re: Why not iPod?
I'm not sure that's true? While I only have the shuffle, I've seen the 20 &
40 GB and, while indeed proprietary, they are a very slick piece of
----- Original Message -----
From: "Arnaud" <email@example.com>
To: "Rockbox" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2005 8:58 AM
Subject: Re: Why not iPod?
> oh no, not Ipod.
> It's a loosy and quite expensive MP3 player with only a good estetic
> feel but little features.
> I think Iriver players or newer Archos player or some others E.G.
> NeoSafa, Samsung, etc. are far far better than the Ipod for a cheaper
> On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 14:23:18 -0400, you wrote:
>>OK, right off the bat, let me say that I despise Apple, Steve Jobs and
>>most of what they stand for. Ahem.
>>That said, is there any reason why the iPod isn't considered for a
>>RockBox port? It would seem that with a port of Linux running on the
>>thing, there should be enough info out there for a port.
>>As I scan the racks of even Walmart and see all the nifty accessories
>>that work only with an iPod, I have to admit that it would be a nice
>>host for RockBox. I'd LOVE to have a set of amplified speakers into
>>which my jukebox would simply snap, like those offered by several
>>different companies for the iPod.
>>I don't want to even appear to become an AppleDroid but OTOH, the
>>hardware is nice...
>>John De Armond
>>See my website for my current email address
>>Cleveland, Occupied TN
> Arnaud de Bonald - http://bonald.org
Received on Sat Sep 24 17:36:52 2005
Page was last modified "Jan 10 2012" The Rockbox Crew