Rockbox mail archive
Subject: Re: humongous lcds
which i could do all that stuff. insufficient spare time.
maybe someday. :)
"ian douglas" <email@example.com> wrote in message news:437D0F32.firstname.lastname@example.org...
> Liberman Shachar wrote:
>> if you think there was a way to make a bigger remote screen work with the
> By simply pulling some wires and splicing onto the existing circuitry, I'd
> guess no. Again, the pins, wires and voltages needed to drive any other
> screen will almost certainly be completely different than what's in place
> to draw pixels on the existing screen. You would need something in between
> (more than just wires) that understands what input signals correspond to a
> drawing a particular pixel, and translate it to send voltages to the
> appropriate pins at the appropriate voltage for the appropriate length of
> time to draw one or more pixels on the bigger screen.
> If by change you find a bigger screen that uses the exact same graphics
> instruction set that your H100 has, then you'll be one step closer, but
> then you'll still need to worry about your next point:
>> if threading 16 pixels to one result in over resistance of the unit and
>> making it explode.
> Yes, there's the likelihood that the output voltage of the H100 graphics
> controller will not be sufficient, or perhaps too sufficient, to drive the
> input pins on the new graphics controller too. You certainly wouldn't want
> to draw on both screens at the same time, regardless if the new graphics
> controller happens to be identical to the one in your H100 - otherwise
> you're increasing the load (resistance) on the circuit, and an increase in
> resistance means a drop in current at the same voltage, which may impact
> other circuits on the board ... you probably know all that already.
> One idea: if your H100 has some kind of output port, like a "remote" that
> has a smaller LCD screen on it, maybe look at how the data is being sent
> back and forth to that screen (scopes and analyzers work great for
> capturing data signals like that), such as a signal that specifies "a
> remote has been plugged in" and signals back like the artist name, song
> title, etc., and use those as input/output signals to a totally different
> circuit that manages the bigger screen and use the input signals to let
> the new circuitry (microcontroller, flash memory, RAM, etc) know what to
> write on the bigger screen. But developing a new board to do all of that
> will cost hundreds of dollars I imagine?
> Ian Douglas
> blogs & photos: http://www.w98.us/
Received on Sat Nov 19 04:49:14 2005
Page was last modified "Jan 10 2012" The Rockbox Crew