>>Ah, we speak at angry dolphins, sorry, cross pourposes. You are speaking
>>from the point of view of the user, I am speaking from aspect of the coder.
>
>Erm... With "the code" I meant the decoding software on Iriver...

hmm. must get a threading email clinet sometime - can't remember what you
said now :(

[[and off topic - not receiving copies of my own posts is a gmail
problem. But since their beta test group is now X million all bug reports
are ignored - so I guess a solution _may_ appear "one day". It does not
present posts from "me" to it's POP interface]]

>If we want to implement DRM playback in rockbox, we will have to check how
>the Iriver FW does it.

"Have to" may be a bit strong, but it certainly seems like one way in.

>But the question if we want it at all is still pending, some people like
>it... Others think we shouldn't implement something like this.

Some like ogg and others flac etc. I do not think this is a good reason to
exclude support for a standard.

BC
Received on Fri Dec 16 15:16:04 2005