Bluechip wrote:
> So my thought on the matter is now this: As the spec allows for
> APpended tags; And as this would resolve what appears to be the worlds
> major gripe about ID3V2 ...Why don't any of the tag editors (that I have
> tested, and there were many many of them) implement this feature?

I'm slightly puzzled by this too. I also wonder why so few ID3V2 aware
programs have implemented the 2.4 standard at all. We had to revert to
generating 2.3 tags in the Rockbox recorded files because so few
applications could understand the 2.4 tags.

Linus
Received on Sun Jan 1 10:45:25 2006