|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Subject: Re: Some H340 impressionsRe: Subject: Re: Some H340 impressions
From: Bluechip <csbluechip_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 18:29:34 +0000 I will confirm your beliefs as to relative power consumption. As for chip control, I don't know. BC >Hmm... wasn't the power consumption quadratically related to the power >consumption? If that's true, it would be better to have a constant average >speed: > >Scenario 1: speed is 3x, 1x, 3x, 1x >power consumption is 9x,1x,9x,1x = 20 > >Scenario 2: speed is 2x, 2x, 2x, 2x >power consumption is 4x,4x,4x,4x = 16 > >Or is it impossible to boost to a certain value? Or am I making some >calculation error? > >Ronald > >On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 12:00:25 +0100, <rockbox-request_at_cool.haxx.se> wrote: > >>On 1/5/06, John Lawrence <blaquestic_at_gmail.com> wrote: >>>why is the CPU boosted at times, and not boosted at other times? >> >>>-John >> >>Hi, >> >>the CPU speed is in direct correlation to the power consumption. The >>high CPU-speed if of course needed for such "complicated" things as >snip >> >>lImbus > Received on 2006-01-05 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |