Rockbox.org home
release
dev builds
extras
themes manual
wiki
device status forums
mailing lists
IRC bugs
patches
dev guide



Rockbox mail archive

Subject: Re: Charging in rb2.5

Re: Charging in rb2.5

From: Glenn at home <GlennErvin_at_cableone.net>
Date: 2006-01-09

I see what you mean now, I was thinking of a situation where the time was
lost.
Don't ask me why I was thinking that.
Glenn
----- Original Message -----
From: "Manuel Dejonghe" <manuel@dejonghe.de>
To: "Glenn at home" <GlennErvin@cableone.net>; "Rockbox"
<rockbox@cool.haxx.se>
Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2006 7:00 PM
Subject: Re: Charging in rb2.5

Sorry Glenn, I totally do not get your query.

Rockbox-Devices with RTC (real time clock) do always know the exact
date and time except if the batteries have gone totally low or have
been replaced. In both cases, a significally OLD date is reported by
the rtc (or even the "empty" data) So that case can be handled as
well.

On shutdown, rockbox would store the battery state (as Bluechip
tought) as well as the date of shutdown.
On startup, rockbox would reuse the stored battery state for
charging(as Bluechip requested) but only if the shutdown was not more
than five days ago.

lImbus

On 1/9/06, Glenn at home <GlennErvin@cableone.net> wrote:
> How would the unit know the real time without going through the trouble of
> changing it?
> Glenn
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Manuel Dejonghe" <manuel@dejonghe.de>
> To: "Rockbox" <rockbox@cool.haxx.se>
> Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2006 5:40 PM
> Subject: Re: Charging in rb2.5
>
>
> On 1/8/06, Bluechip <csbluechip@gmail.com> wrote:
> > If the unit has been powered off for
> > some days/weeks the reading would be terribly wrong given the general
> > nature of modern batteries, ...
>
> For that case, the date/time of shutdown could be stored as well on
> the units with rtc. The stored value could then be rejected after 5
> days or so.
>
> lImbus
>
>
>
>
Received on Mon Jan 9 02:05:20 2006


Page was last modified "Jan 10 2012" The Rockbox Crew
aaa