Rockbox.org home
release
dev builds
extras
themes manual
wiki
device status forums
mailing lists
IRC bugs
patches
dev guide



Rockbox mail archive

Subject: Re: Anti-skip buffer question

Re: Anti-skip buffer question

From: David Pedersen <dav-ped_at_frisurf.no>
Date: 2006-04-25

To save as much battery power, and to save the HD the most, will it be best
to have the antiskip buffer set to max (7 secs)? Or, is there any better
setting, when it comes to anti-skip buffer and PM?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Brandon Low" <lostlogic@lostlogicx.com>
To: "Rockbox" <rockbox@cool.haxx.se>
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 6:20 AM
Subject: Re: Anti-skip buffer question

> The RAM is filled with audio data, the anti-skip buffer is the minimum
> level of audio data allowed to be on that buffer before a refill is
> triggered. Thus you have that many seconds of the HDD not being able to
> read before the audio will skip, if you are shaking the player as it
> starts a buffer fill.
>
> Brandon
>
> On Thu, 04/27/06 at 09:17:12 +0100, Steve Bavin wrote:
>> Under SWCOCEC, I was under the impression that all spare RAM is used for
>> pre-buffering audio. Is this correct?
>>
>> If so, what difference does the anti-skip buffer make?
>>
>> Steve Bavin
>>
>>
>
>
>
Received on Thu Apr 27 12:31:53 2006


Page was last modified "Jan 10 2012" The Rockbox Crew
aaa