Rockbox.org home
release
dev builds
extras
themes manual
wiki
device status forums
mailing lists
IRC bugs
patches
dev guide



Rockbox mail archive

Subject: Re: Rockbox performance: Nano vs. Video?

Re: Rockbox performance: Nano vs. Video?

From: Sean Clark <v13inc_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2006-05-11

I've briefly used a nano with rockbox and am using my with rockbox. I
have noticed some lag while the disk spins up, but it isn't anything
irrirating. The main performance difference comes from the resolution
of the devices. If you are playing games or using plugins, the nano is
much faster, since it has about 1/2 the resolution of the video. I
can't play a lot of games and play music at the same time on my video,
whereas it is no problem on the nano.

On 5/10/06, ScottLearned <SLearned@cox.net> wrote:
> Hello,
> I was wondering if someone using Rockbox on a Nano could tell me how the
> performance is on a flash based player compared to physical drive models
> like the Video?
>
> I am wondering if it would be faster since it wouldn't have to wait for the
> disc to spin up.
>
> Thanks for any information on this.
> Scott
>
>
Received on Thu May 11 03:39:24 2006


Page was last modified "Jan 10 2012" The Rockbox Crew
aaa