Rockbox mail archive
Subject: Re: Gmini 220 or Jukebox FM Recorder
Re: Gmini 220 or Jukebox FM Recorder
Hamish Mackenzie said:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mike Holden" <rockbox_at_mikeholden.org>
> To: <rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se>
> Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 10:07 PM
> Subject: Re: Gmini 220 or Jukebox FM Recorder
>> mat holton said:
>>>> mat holton wrote:
>>>>> Saying that, I've just bought an iriver H320 as I found one
>>>>> (fairly) cheap on ebay (I still own an FMR but the headphone socket
>>>>> is broken). This is an ace device and it runs rockbox. The only
>>>>> problem is the battery time is only 9 hours (it was 19 on my
>>>> Really? Then your battery must be really bad. You should get at
>>>> least 12-15 hours with Rockbox.
>>> Well, I'm just going by what Rockbox tells me in the info screen at
>>> the moment, I'm going to properly benchmark it over the next few
>> The runtime is actually about 18 hours or so, but due to a bug, the
>> reporting of runtime hasn't been recalibrated after a big improvement
>> of battery life some weeks ago (disabling the USBOTG chip, which drew
>> lots of power even though it wasn't active).
>> As a short-term workaround (pending a proper fix in the code), change
>> your battery capacity from 1300 to 2600 mah in the settings screen,
>> which should get you pretty close.
>> Mike Holden
> Does this changing of the battery capacity just refer to the IRivers or
> would this change also improve battery life on a Nano running RB as
> I am guessing not but thought it might be worth asking.
I think you are misunderstanding the point I am making.
Changing the battery capacity setting doesn't affect the actual battery
life of the unit, merely the reporting of the expected runtime. In either
case, the actual runtime will be the same, but the reported runtime will
be more accurate by telling rockbox that your battery has a bigger
The setting doesn't actually affect the real runtime of the unit.
Received on 2006-07-17
Page was last modified "Jan 10 2012" The Rockbox Crew