> alex wallis wrote:
>>
>> Hi. I thought that the major problem with accessibility of the rockbox
>> utility was the fact that the version of qt it is built with isn't very
>> friendly with screen readers? I thought the qt developers had addressed
>> this in an update though.
> My understanding is that it should already be accessible in Windows (and
> possibly OS-X, I'm unclear on this) but that the lack in Qt prevents
> accessibility in Linux at this time. But even where there is some
> accessibility, there may be usability hindrances (or problems with
> specific screen readers) that we are unable to anticipate or correct
> ourselves.

Hi. Just as an experiment though has anyone tried building the utility with
the latest version of qt just to see if that makes a difference to
accessibility?
mostly with an application its important that all the dialogs, forms buttons
etc have caption text so they can be read with a screen reader.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> List admin: http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rockbox
> FAQ: http://www.rockbox.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/GeneralFAQ
> Etiquette: http://www.rockbox.org/mail/etiquette.html

-------------------------------------------------------------------
List admin: http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rockbox
FAQ: http://www.rockbox.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/GeneralFAQ
Etiquette: http://www.rockbox.org/mail/etiquette.html
Received on 2008-11-18