On Tue, 24 Feb 2009, Michael Sevakis wrote:

>> I've come to the conclusion that, without preserving decoder state
>> information, maybe that's as good as it's going to get.

> See, the problem is that the decoder should know its own latency and the
> encoder knows its own and so can store that information in the XING
> header.

Now that's interesting. If I encode my test files separately using lame
(with an Info tag), I do get a gapless splice.

Bizarrely, if I encode using --nogap and --nogaptags, I don't, but the
splice isn't as noticeable as with tagless (and gapless) streams.

I'm stumped.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
List admin: http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rockbox
FAQ: http://www.rockbox.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/GeneralFAQ
Etiquette: http://www.rockbox.org/mail/etiquette.html
Received on 2009-02-25