On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 11:04, Arno Wald<arno.wald_at_netcologne.de> wrote:

> I was wrong: The rips certainly are 48 kHz, not 96 kHz. 48 kHz are played
> fine with RB v3.3.
>
> Could it be that rockbox was capable of playing 96 kHz Sounds, too, if the
> CPU was running at a higher speed? Maybe rockbox is slowing it down too much
> in this case for saving power?

Yes, a faster CPU should allow the file to play. But in this case it
is already running as fast as it can; Rockbox only slows down to save
power when possible (without getting choppy playback).

-- 
  Magnus
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rockbox
FAQ:         http://www.rockbox.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/GeneralFAQ
Etiquette:   http://www.rockbox.org/mail/etiquette.html