Magnus Holmgren wrote:

> Well, there's FS#10492. But if 3.2 really worked (and I'd like to see
> that verified; I'll try the file that aborts for me), then this problem
> could've been introduced in r20783.

Or maybe not. The file reported in that bug, including the similar case
I found, works when I test on a recent build. I noticed it while working
on r22528, so I doubt that fixed it...

Anyway, worth testing a current build.

   Magnus
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rockbox
FAQ: http://www.rockbox.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/GeneralFAQ
Etiquette: http://www.rockbox.org/mail/etiquette.html
Received on 2009-08-30