On 15.05.2012 17:18, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> I've had a quick look at this, and I have to wonder, why don't you use
> rockboxdev.sh?

I have a quick answer to this - you still can use rockboxdev.sh :)

Oleg.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rockbox
FAQ: http://www.rockbox.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/GeneralFAQ
Etiquette: http://www.rockbox.org/mail/etiquette.html
Received on 2012-05-15